FORMAX 5×5 Performance Analytics
Advanced Athletic Assessment with Real-Time Observable Traits Integration
ATHLETE PROFILE
STEP 1: Complete athlete and evaluator information above, then proceed to performance evaluation below.
EVALUATION CONFIGURATION
Customize layer weightings and age group expectations for your assessment protocol.
Weight Configuration Matrix
Configuration Protocol
Layer Weights: Multipliers applied to raw scores (1.0 = baseline, 2.0 = double emphasis)
Expected Layer: Target performance layer for age group (developmental benchmark)
Philosophy: Higher layers receive increased weight reflecting advanced skill complexity
PERFORMANCE RADAR
Real-Time Performance Visualization
Interactive radar showing layer-weighted performance across all domains
PERFORMANCE DOMAINS
← Swipe to see all values →
Initializing Performance Analytics...
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
0%
Weighted Development Index
ADVANCED ANALYTICS
METRICS GUIDE
Performance Snapshot (300-850):
Overall athletic performance score similar to a credit rating. Higher scores indicate superior development across all domains.
Overall athletic performance score similar to a credit rating. Higher scores indicate superior development across all domains.
Domain Balance Index (0-100%):
Measures development symmetry across domains. 100% indicates perfectly balanced skills; lower values suggest uneven development.
Measures development symmetry across domains. 100% indicates perfectly balanced skills; lower values suggest uneven development.
Layer Advancement Ready:
Count of domains scoring 8+ at current layer, indicating readiness to progress to more complex training environments.
Count of domains scoring 8+ at current layer, indicating readiness to progress to more complex training environments.
Consistency Score (0-100%):
Statistical measure of performance uniformity. Higher percentages indicate more consistent skill levels across domains.
Statistical measure of performance uniformity. Higher percentages indicate more consistent skill levels across domains.
Technical Ceiling:
Highest layer where athlete maintains competent performance (score 5+) across any domain, indicating peak complexity management.
Highest layer where athlete maintains competent performance (score 5+) across any domain, indicating peak complexity management.
Growth Indicator:
Performance trajectory relative to age-expected standards. Arrows indicate acceleration (↑), progression (↗), stability (→), or delay (↓).
Performance trajectory relative to age-expected standards. Arrows indicate acceleration (↑), progression (↗), stability (→), or delay (↓).
Training Load (1-10):
Recommended training intensity based on current performance capacity. Higher values suggest readiness for increased challenge.
Recommended training intensity based on current performance capacity. Higher values suggest readiness for increased challenge.
Elite Potential (0-100%):
Age-adjusted projection of reaching elite performance levels (Layer 4-5), based on current trajectory and developmental stage.
Age-adjusted projection of reaching elite performance levels (Layer 4-5), based on current trajectory and developmental stage.
PERFORMANCE HEAT MAP
← Swipe to see full heat map →
DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOL
"We do not coach to win; we coach to build performers who win long-term.
Technical automation before tactical introduction. Expressiveness is the end goal."
Technical automation before tactical introduction. Expressiveness is the end goal."
DOMAIN ANALYSIS MATRIX
| Performance Domain | Layer | Raw Score | Weight | Weighted Score | Development Status |
|---|
← Swipe to see all columns →
FORMAX ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
DOMAIN INTERDEPENDENCY FLOW
COORDINATION
Foundation
→
KINESTHETIC
Ball Feel
→
ACCURACY
Precision
→
RANGE
Options
→
FUNCTIONAL
Application
Each domain builds upon the previous. Weaknesses in foundational domains limit advancement in dependent domains.
Performance Indicators (Layer-Specific)
9-10: Elite Performance - Consistent execution under pressure
7-8: Advanced Performance - Reliable technical application
5-6: Competent Performance - Meets layer requirements
3-4: Developing Performance - Inconsistent execution
1-2: Emerging Performance - Frequent technical breakdown
Assessment Principle
Performance at Layer 3 (Score 6) represents superior development compared to Layer 1 (Score 10),
as layer complexity defines the environmental demands where skills are demonstrated.
Observable Traits Integration
• Real-time behavioral indicators from live assessment database
• Evidence-based performance markers for objective evaluation
• Standardized assessment criteria across all evaluations
• Data-driven scoring methodology for performance consistency
DATA EXPORT OPTIONS
FORMAX 6×6 Performance Analytics
Neuro-Cognitive Framework for Elite Player Development
Debug Log:
System initializing...
ATHLETE PROFILE
⚠️ COGNITIVE LOAD FIDELITY GATEKEEPER ACTIVE
Performance Progression Blocked: Cognitive Load Fidelity is more than one layer behind other domains.
Skills that fail under cognitive load will not transfer to match play. Focus on CLF development before advancing other domains.
PERFORMANCE RADAR
⚠️ Chart Display Issue
Canvas rendering not available
6×6 matrix visualization showing layer-weighted performance across all domains
DOMAINS OF MASTERY
Coordination & Body Control
5.0
Competent Performance
Purpose: Build a base of clean, replicable, pressure-free execution in isolated and semi-isolated settings.
Layer 1 | Score 5
Observable Performance Cues
Functional body control with compensatory patterns. Requires cueing for optimal alignment.
Kinesthetic Feel for the Ball
5.0
Competent Performance
Purpose: Build a base of clean, replicable, pressure-free execution in isolated and semi-isolated settings.
Layer 1 | Score 5
Observable Performance Cues
Basic ball contact achieved but requires multiple touches to achieve desired outcome.
Accuracy & Execution Speed
5.0
Competent Performance
Purpose: Build a base of clean, replicable, pressure-free execution in isolated and semi-isolated settings.
Layer 1 | Score 5
Observable Performance Cues
Basic accuracy present but inconsistent. Frequently misses intended targets or weights.
Range of Mastered Technical Elements
5.0
Competent Performance
Purpose: Build a base of clean, replicable, pressure-free execution in isolated and semi-isolated settings.
Layer 1 | Score 5
Observable Performance Cues
Limited to 1-2 reliable techniques with heavy dominance on one foot.
Functional Integration
5.0
Competent Performance
Purpose: Build a base of clean, replicable, pressure-free execution in isolated and semi-isolated settings.
Layer 1 | Score 5
Observable Performance Cues
Basic tactical understanding present but execution is inconsistent or delayed.
Cognitive Load Fidelity (GATEKEEPER)
5.0
Competent Performance
Purpose: Build a base of clean, replicable, pressure-free execution in isolated and semi-isolated settings.
Layer 1 | Score 5
Observable Performance Cues
Basic performance present but requires optimal conditions and constant structure.
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
0%
Contextual Mastery Index
DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOL
6×6 MATRIX ANALYSIS
| Domain of Mastery | Layer | Score | Weighted | Status | CLF Impact |
|---|
FORMAX 6×6 FRAMEWORK
6 Domains of Mastery
Coordination & Body Control: Stability and biomechanical efficiency
Kinesthetic Feel: Ball manipulation and surface fluency
Accuracy & Speed: Precision at tempo under pressure
Range of Elements: Technical vocabulary breadth
Functional Integration: Perception-action coupling
Cognitive Load Fidelity: Performance under match demands
6 Layers of Progression
Layer 1: Foundational Precision
Layer 2: Coordinated Execution
Layer 3: Functional Integration Under Pressure
Layer 4: Mastery Across Contexts
Layer 5: Expressive Synthesis
Layer 6: Adaptive Stability
Cognitive Load Fidelity Gatekeeper
CLF serves as the progression gatekeeper. If CLF lags more than one layer behind other domains,
advancement is blocked until CLF improves. This ensures skill transfer from training to match play.