FORMAX 5×5 Performance Analytics
Advanced Athletic Assessment with Real-Time Observable Traits Integration
ATHLETE PROFILE
STEP 1: Complete athlete and evaluator information above, then proceed to performance evaluation below.
EVALUATION CONFIGURATION
Customize layer weightings and age group expectations for your assessment protocol.
Weight Configuration Matrix
Configuration Protocol
Layer Weights: Multipliers applied to raw scores (1.0 = baseline, 2.0 = double emphasis)
Expected Layer: Target performance layer for age group (developmental benchmark)
Philosophy: Higher layers receive increased weight reflecting advanced skill complexity
PERFORMANCE RADAR
Real-Time Performance Visualization
Interactive radar showing layer-weighted performance across all domains
PERFORMANCE DOMAINS
← Swipe to see all values →
Initializing Performance Analytics...
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
0%
Weighted Development Index
ADVANCED ANALYTICS
METRICS GUIDE
Performance Snapshot (300-850):
Overall athletic performance score similar to a credit rating. Higher scores indicate superior development across all domains.
Overall athletic performance score similar to a credit rating. Higher scores indicate superior development across all domains.
Domain Balance Index (0-100%):
Measures development symmetry across domains. 100% indicates perfectly balanced skills; lower values suggest uneven development.
Measures development symmetry across domains. 100% indicates perfectly balanced skills; lower values suggest uneven development.
Layer Advancement Ready:
Count of domains scoring 8+ at current layer, indicating readiness to progress to more complex training environments.
Count of domains scoring 8+ at current layer, indicating readiness to progress to more complex training environments.
Consistency Score (0-100%):
Statistical measure of performance uniformity. Higher percentages indicate more consistent skill levels across domains.
Statistical measure of performance uniformity. Higher percentages indicate more consistent skill levels across domains.
Technical Ceiling:
Highest layer where athlete maintains competent performance (score 5+) across any domain, indicating peak complexity management.
Highest layer where athlete maintains competent performance (score 5+) across any domain, indicating peak complexity management.
Growth Indicator:
Performance trajectory relative to age-expected standards. Arrows indicate acceleration (↑), progression (↗), stability (→), or delay (↓).
Performance trajectory relative to age-expected standards. Arrows indicate acceleration (↑), progression (↗), stability (→), or delay (↓).
Training Load (1-10):
Recommended training intensity based on current performance capacity. Higher values suggest readiness for increased challenge.
Recommended training intensity based on current performance capacity. Higher values suggest readiness for increased challenge.
Elite Potential (0-100%):
Age-adjusted projection of reaching elite performance levels (Layer 4-5), based on current trajectory and developmental stage.
Age-adjusted projection of reaching elite performance levels (Layer 4-5), based on current trajectory and developmental stage.
PERFORMANCE HEAT MAP
← Swipe to see full heat map →
DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOL
"We do not coach to win; we coach to build performers who win long-term.
Technical automation before tactical introduction. Expressiveness is the end goal."
Technical automation before tactical introduction. Expressiveness is the end goal."
DOMAIN ANALYSIS MATRIX
| Performance Domain | Layer | Raw Score | Weight | Weighted Score | Development Status |
|---|
← Swipe to see all columns →
FORMAX ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
DOMAIN INTERDEPENDENCY FLOW
COORDINATION
Foundation
→
KINESTHETIC
Ball Feel
→
ACCURACY
Precision
→
RANGE
Options
→
FUNCTIONAL
Application
Each domain builds upon the previous. Weaknesses in foundational domains limit advancement in dependent domains.
Performance Indicators (Layer-Specific)
9-10: Elite Performance - Consistent execution under pressure
7-8: Advanced Performance - Reliable technical application
5-6: Competent Performance - Meets layer requirements
3-4: Developing Performance - Inconsistent execution
1-2: Emerging Performance - Frequent technical breakdown
Assessment Principle
Performance at Layer 3 (Score 6) represents superior development compared to Layer 1 (Score 10),
as layer complexity defines the environmental demands where skills are demonstrated.
Observable Traits Integration
• Real-time behavioral indicators from live assessment database
• Evidence-based performance markers for objective evaluation
• Standardized assessment criteria across all evaluations
• Data-driven scoring methodology for performance consistency